I don’t think she killed the baby. I believe it was stillborn or died shortly after. If the autopsy was inconclusive then those are the facts.
It amazes me she could keep this secret for so long. But with her anorexia/ bulimia problems it stands to reason the baby was born compromised.
Am I saying she’s all innocent? No.
There’s just not enough conclusive evidence here. If she did not burn the baby then why did it have burns on it? Or what were these marks if they were not burns?
Lots of unanswered questions.